We've been eating out a lot lately and I have a fear of/aversion to taking quality photos in a restaurant. I've tried using my trusty iPhone with terrible results...
These delicious looking dishes were from Hot and Hot Fish Club .
Is it just me or do these look like undercover police photos taken from a camera mounted on a tie clip? "Exhibit A is a picture of the grouper cooked in parchment. The picture was taken by officer Malarky at a sting operation in the Harpersville Motel at 1 AM on February 21st."
Moe's Barbeque. Good BBQ, bad picture.
Tortilla Soup at Las Poblanas in Childersburg, AL.
The soup was good but I think my wife got the flu here.
Surin's Curried Eggplant Noodle. My absolute favorite dish at Surin 280.
I don't know why I refuse to take "real" pictures in restaurants. Maybe I feel it makes the other patrons uncomfortable or distracts from the dining ritual. (I enjoy the act of dining as much as the act of eating. Yes, there is a difference.) Is it not insanely awkward to pull out an SLR and start a photo shoot in a restaurant? But I want to be able to share my dining out experiences with some degree of quality. Or do I? Do I really care to do all that it takes to get a good photo of some food at a restaurant? Am I just not as "hardcore" as I thought?
Maybe, just sometimes, I want to eat a meal like everyone else does, without writing my thoughts/criticisms down in a notebook and snapping 10 pics with different aperture settings.
A quick phone picture is enough, sometimes.
It is hard to discern between blog-worthy, un-blog-worthy, and experiences too good to ruin with over-documentation.
Log this one under lessons learned in my short time as a "food blogger". And until something changes, just expect crappy photos to accompany posts about restaurants.